Similar inspiration? sure. Similar aesthetics? sure. Similar technique? sure.
But what I don't want to do is to pump out work that is interchangeable. I want all the work to be good and "me," but I don't want people to look at a series and think "well, he made them so we could buy whichever one...they're all basically the same." It's that across-the-board, lack of investigation that really turns me off of many artists I see around here, and a constant between those artists always seems to be that they have this "style" or process to their work. While the subject, composition and color are different, everything is so setup, planned out, known before hand, and "staged" that the work loses it's "artistic quality" and basically becomes a big pretty poster, advertising the look of that particular artist. I fear that such a unique look can trap an artist and it's something I'm legitimately afraid of. The last thing I want to be is an artist who found his best thing at age 23 and spent the rest of his life devaluing it to the point of mass-production...
I'll figure it out eventually I suppose, but its not gonna be easy...what about art ever is.
I Think The Kids Are In Trouble |
He Had Gold Running Through His Fingertips |
No comments:
Post a Comment