This story confuses me a bit.
Artist sells work but refuses to deliver because collector is known as an "art-flipper." Is art-flipping illegal? Did he not pay the amount asked for? I'm not saying I support the idea of "art flipping" but I kind of don't understand the position of the artist. You sold a piece for a specific amount...if you don't like the collector or what he's known to do with art, you shouldn't have agreed to sell the piece...am I missing something?
http://news.artnet.com/market/art-flipper-bert-kreuk-sues-artist-danh-vo-for-12-million-93788
No comments:
Post a Comment