The original review...
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/24/arts/design/michelle-grabner.html
The local reaction...
http://www.jsonline.com/entertainment/arts/new-york-times-critic-calls-michelle-grabner-a-soccer-mom-with-bland-art-in-lazy-review-b99379195z1-280571462.html
Worthy of note is the fact that Ken Johnson, the critic in question, has been in a bit of hot water over sexist and racist accusations before...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/29/ken-johnson-new-york-times-art-critic-racist-sexist_n_2213563.html
and lastly, another review of the show published before the review in question...
http://www.blouinartinfo.com/news/story/1056839/parts-and-labor-michelle-grabner-gets-to-work
Interesting to note both articles, the "sexist" article and the earlier from ArtInfo, seem to comment on the "domestic" aspects of the work, the fact that being midwestern is an important aspect of her career, that she's interested in boredom (bland is different but not that far a stretch), and even includes the following quote from Grabner herself...
“I was really drawn to patterns in my domestic middle-class lifestyle: The blankets that the kids were swaddled in,” she said. More recently, she “wanted to revisit that same kind of domestic patterning, but without the nostalgia.”So, by the artists definition, her work is, to some extent, linked to her "domestic middle-class lifestyle"...Obviously, the tone of the articles is completely different from one another, but interesting to note the similarities as well...
What do you think?
and a follow-up from Mary Louise Schumacher on why she thinks Grabner and her work deserve better...
http://www.jsonline.com/entertainment/arts/michelle-grabners-alternative-art-world-is-worth-some-scrutiny-b99380055z1-280693192.html#
No comments:
Post a Comment